You Say Tomato, I Say Waste

Sen. Rand Paul Releases Latest ‘Waste Report’

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

March 30, 2017

 Contact: Press@paul.senate.gov, 202-224-4343

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Rand Paul released the latest edition of “The Waste Report,” an ongoing project cataloguing egregious examples of waste within the U.S. government.

Tomatoes not quite tasting like they used to? Don’t worry. Your tax dollars are on the case, with the National Science Foundation (NSF) spending over $1.5 million to research how to improve a tomato’s flavor.

One would expect private companies to invest to make their products better, but Dr. Paul’s Report asks if it is in the taxpayers’ best interest to spend their hard-earned funds on what is already a highly popular, massive industry.

You can learn more in this week’s “Waste Report” HERE or below. 

 ****

Tomatoes: they put the “T” in BLT, are found on burgers, and make salsa what it is. They are in ketchup, pizza sauce, soups, and more. In short, tomatoes are all over the place.

In fact, the average American consumes approximately 31.4 pounds of tomatoes each year, making it the second most consumed vegetable in the United States after potatoes.

So, given its versatility and popularity, one has to wonder why the National Science Foundation spent over $1.5 million trying to improve the taste of tomatoes.

Make no mistake, the research is about taste. In NSF’s January press release, “Scientists develop genetic path to tastier tomatoes,” the director of the Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (where the funding came from) said, "This state-of-the-art analysis sets the stage to return it to the taste of decades ago by breeding informed by molecular genetics."

Apparently the research found that modern tomatoes are less tasty because they have less sugar and other flavorful chemicals. Wait … sugar will make something taste better?

IS THIS IN THE TAXPAYER’S INTEREST?

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), three fourths of American tomato consumption is in “processed form”: sauces, ketchup, juice, etc. Further, over a quarter of all tomato consumption occurs “away from home.”

These facts seem to indicate there is a significant commercial interest in the tomato. So, one might ask why Uncle Sam is funding better tasting tomatoes and not Heinz, Papa John’s, or Campbell’s.

The answer may be that their raw taste really does not matter that much if the bulk of tomatoes are enjoyed as part of more complex foods.  

MAYBE IT’S ECONOMICS

Certainly one could argue that making a vegetable taste better will improve its economic viability. NSF even said that “[b]reeding a more flavorful tomato could benefit consumers as well as the tomato industry.” One researcher on the project said, "We can make the supermarket tomato taste noticeably better."

So, is the tomato industry hurting? As we have already noted, tomatoes are the second most consumed vegetable in the U.S. The U.S. is the second largest producer of raw tomatoes in the world, making it a $2 billion annual industry. If only they tasted better. 

 

STILL NO WORD ON MAKING

BRUSSELS SPROUTS TASTE BETTER

###

Note: Tomatoes are technically a fruit. 

https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=58340

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1539831&HistoricalAwards=false

https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=190832

https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/vegetables-pulses/tomatoes.aspx

https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=190832

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170126142901.htm

https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/vegetables-pulses/tomatoes.aspx